Paper detail

Configurations of structural defects in graphene and their effects on its transport properties

The chapter combines analytical (statistical-thermodynamic and kinetic) with numerical (Kubo-Greenwood-formalism-based) approaches used to ascertain an influence of the configurations of point (impurities, vacancies) and line (grain boundaries, atomic steps) defects on the charge transport in graphene. Possible substitutional and interstitial graphene-based superstructures are predicted and described. The arrangements of dopants over sites or interstices related with interatomic-interaction energies governing the configurations of impurities. Depending on whether the interatomic interactions are short- or long-range, the low-temperature stability diagrams in terms of interaction-energy parameters are obtained. The dominance of intersublattice interactions in competition with intrasublattice ones results in a nonmonotony of ordering-process kinetics. Spatial correlations of impurities do not affect the electronic conductivity of graphene for the most important experimentally-relevant cases of point defects, neutral adatoms and screened charged impurities, while atomic ordering can give rise in the conductivity up to tens times for weak and strong short-range potentials. There is no ordering effect manifestation for long-range potentials. The anisotropy of the conductivity along and across the line defects is revealed and gives rise in the conductivity of graphene with correlated line defects as compared with the case of random ones. Simultaneously correlated (and/or ordered) point and line defects in graphene can give rise in the conductivity up to hundreds times vs. their random distribution. On an example of different B or N doping configurations in graphene, results from the Kubo-Greenwood approach are compared with those obtained from DFT method.

preprint2014arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.