Paper detail

Confidential Attestation: Efficient in-Enclave Verification of Privacy Policy Compliance

A trusted execution environment (TEE) such as Intel Software Guard Extension (SGX) runs a remote attestation to prove to a data owner the integrity of the initial state of an enclave, including the program to operate on her data. For this purpose, the data-processing program is supposed to be open to the owner, so its functionality can be evaluated before trust can be established. However, increasingly there are application scenarios in which the program itself needs to be protected. So its compliance with privacy policies as expected by the data owner should be verified without exposing its code. To this end, this paper presents CAT, a new model for TEE-based confidential attestation. Our model is inspired by Proof-Carrying Code, where a code generator produces proof together with the code and a code consumer verifies the proof against the code on its compliance with security policies. Given that the conventional solutions do not work well under the resource-limited and TCB-frugal TEE, we propose a new design that allows an untrusted out-enclave generator to analyze the source code of a program when compiling it into binary and a trusted in-enclave consumer efficiently verifies the correctness of the instrumentation and the presence of other protection before running the binary. Our design strategically moves most of the workload to the code generator, which is responsible for producing well-formatted and easy-to-check code, while keeping the consumer simple. Also, the whole consumer can be made public and verified through a conventional attestation. We implemented this model on Intel SGX and demonstrate that it introduces a very small part of TCB. We also thoroughly evaluated its performance on micro- and macro- benchmarks and real-world applications, showing that the new design only incurs a small overhead when enforcing several categories of security policies.

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access12 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.