Paper detail

Confidence Dimension for Deep Learning based on Hoeffding Inequality and Relative Evaluation

Research on the generalization ability of deep neural networks (DNNs) has recently attracted a great deal of attention. However, due to their complex architectures and large numbers of parameters, measuring the generalization ability of specific DNN models remains an open challenge. In this paper, we propose to use multiple factors to measure and rank the relative generalization of DNNs based on a new concept of confidence dimension (CD). Furthermore, we provide a feasible framework in our CD to theoretically calculate the upper bound of generalization based on the conventional Vapnik-Chervonenk dimension (VC-dimension) and Hoeffding's inequality. Experimental results on image classification and object detection demonstrate that our CD can reflect the relative generalization ability for different DNNs. In addition to full-precision DNNs, we also analyze the generalization ability of binary neural networks (BNNs), whose generalization ability remains an unsolved problem. Our CD yields a consistent and reliable measure and ranking for both full-precision DNNs and BNNs on all the tasks.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.