Paper detail

Concurrent CPU-GPU Task Programming using Modern C++

In this paper, we introduce Heteroflow, a new C++ library to help developers quickly write parallel CPU-GPU programs using task dependency graphs. Heteroflow leverages the power of modern C++ and task-based approaches to enable efficient implementations of heterogeneous decomposition strategies. Our new CPU-GPU programming model allows users to express a problem in a way that adapts to effective separation of concerns and expertise encapsulation. Compared with existing libraries, Heteroflow is more cost-efficient in performance scaling, programming productivity, and solution generality. We have evaluated Heteroflow on two real applications in VLSI design automation and demonstrated the performance scalability across different CPU-GPU numbers and problem sizes. At a particular example of VLSI timing analysis with million-scale tasking, Heteroflow achieved 7.7x runtime speed-up (99 vs 13 minutes) over a baseline on a machine of 40 CPU cores and 4 GPUs.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.