Paper detail

Conclusions from a NAIVE Bayes Operator Predicting the Medicare 2011 Transaction Data Set

Introduction: The United States Federal Government operates one of the worlds largest medical insurance programs, Medicare, to ensure payment for clinical services for the elderly, illegal aliens and those without the ability to pay for their care directly. This paper evaluates the Medicare 2011 Transaction Data Set which details the transfer of funds from Medicare to private and public clinical care facilities for specific clinical services for the operational year 2011. Methods: Data mining was conducted to establish the relationships between reported and computed transaction values in the data set to better understand the drivers of Medicare transactions at a programmatic level. Results: The models averaged 88 for average model accuracy and 38 for average Kappa during training. Some reported classes are highly independent from the available data as their predictability remains stable regardless of redaction of supporting and contradictory evidence. DRG or procedure type appears to be unpredictable from the available financial transaction values. Conclusions: Overlay hypotheses such as charges being driven by the volume served or DRG being related to charges or payments is readily false in this analysis despite 28 million Americans being billed through Medicare in 2011 and the program distributing over 70 billion in this transaction set alone. It may be impossible to predict the dependencies and data structures the payer of last resort without data from payers of first and second resort. Political concerns about Medicare would be better served focusing on these first and second order payer systems as what Medicare costs is not dependent on Medicare itself.

preprint2014arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author3 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.