Paper detail

Concerning Toponogov's Theorem and logarithmic improvement of estimates of eigenfunctions

We use Toponogov's triangle comparison theorem from Riemannian geometry along with quantitative scale oriented variants of classical propagation of singularities arguments to obtain logarithmic improvements of the Kakeya-Nikodym norms introduced in \cite{SKN} for manifolds of nonpositive sectional curvature. Using these and results from our paper \cite{BS15} we are able to obtain log-improvements of $L^p(M)$ estimates for such manifolds when $2<p<\tfrac{2(n+1)}{n-1}$. These in turn imply $(\logλ)^{σ_n}$, $σ_n\approx n$, improved lower bounds for $L^1$-norms of eigenfunctions of the estimates of the second author and Zelditch~\cite{SZ11}, and using a result from Hezari and the second author~\cite{HS}, under this curvature assumption, we are able to improve the lower bounds for the size of nodal sets of Colding and Minicozzi~\cite{CM} by a factor of $(\log λ)^μ$ for any $μ<\tfrac{2(n+1)^2}{n-1}$, if $n\ge3$.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors3 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.