Paper detail

Concept Bottleneck Model with Additional Unsupervised Concepts

With the increasing demands for accountability, interpretability is becoming an essential capability for real-world AI applications. However, most methods utilize post-hoc approaches rather than training the interpretable model. In this article, we propose a novel interpretable model based on the concept bottleneck model (CBM). CBM uses concept labels to train an intermediate layer as the additional visible layer. However, because the number of concept labels restricts the dimension of this layer, it is difficult to obtain high accuracy with a small number of labels. To address this issue, we integrate supervised concepts with unsupervised ones trained with self-explaining neural networks (SENNs). By seamlessly training these two types of concepts while reducing the amount of computation, we can obtain both supervised and unsupervised concepts simultaneously, even for large-sized images. We refer to the proposed model as the concept bottleneck model with additional unsupervised concepts (CBM-AUC). We experimentally confirmed that the proposed model outperformed CBM and SENN. We also visualized the saliency map of each concept and confirmed that it was consistent with the semantic meanings.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.