Paper detail

Concentration of the number of solutions of random planted CSPs and Goldreich's one-way candidates

This paper shows that the logarithm of the number of solutions of a random planted $k$-SAT formula concentrates around a deterministic $n$-independent threshold. Specifically, if $F^*_{k}(α,n)$ is a random $k$-SAT formula on $n$ variables, with clause density $α$ and with a uniformly drawn planted solution, there exists a function $ϕ_k(\cdot)$ such that, besides for some $α$ in a set of Lesbegue measure zero, we have $ \frac{1}{n}\log Z(F^*_{k}(α,n)) \to ϕ_k(α)$ in probability, where $Z(F)$ is the number of solutions of the formula $F$. This settles a problem left open in Abbe-Montanari RANDOM 2013, where the concentration is obtained only for the expected logarithm over the clause distribution. The result is also extended to a more general class of random planted CSPs; in particular, it is shown that the number of pre-images for the Goldreich one-way function model concentrates for some choices of the predicates.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.