BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

Katherine Edwards

Katherine Edwards contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
Discrete Mathematicsmath.CO

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 17 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
4works
0followers
2topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

4 published item(s)

preprint2013arXiv

Bounding the fractional chromatic number of $K_Δ$-free graphs

King, Lu, and Peng recently proved that for $Δ\geq 4$, any $K_Δ$-free graph with maximum degree $Δ$ has fractional chromatic number at most $Δ-\tfrac{2}{67}$ unless it is isomorphic to $C_5\boxtimes K_2$ or $C_8^2$. Using a different approach we give improved bounds for $Δ\geq 6$ and pose several related conjectures. Our proof relies on a weighted local generalization of the fractional relaxation of Reed's $ω$, $Δ$, $χ$ conjecture.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2012arXiv

A note on hitting maximum and maximal cliques with a stable set

It was recently proved that any graph satisfying $ω> \frac 23(Δ+1)$ contains a stable set hitting every maximum clique. In this note we prove that the same is true for graphs satisfying $ω\geq \frac 23(Δ+1)$ unless the graph is the strong product of $K_{ω/2}$ and an odd hole. We also provide a counterexample to a recent conjecture on the existence of a stable set hitting every sufficiently large maximal clique.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2012arXiv

Edge-colouring eight-regular planar graphs

It was conjectured by the third author in about 1973 that every $d$-regular planar graph (possibly with parallel edges) can be $d$-edge-coloured, provided that for every odd set $X$ of vertices, there are at least $d$ edges between $X$ and its complement. For $d = 3$ this is the four-colour theorem, and the conjecture has been proved for all $d\le 7$, by various authors. Here we prove it for $d = 8$.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2012arXiv

Edge-colouring seven-regular planar graphs

A conjecture due to the fourth author states that every $d$-regular planar multigraph can be $d$-edge-coloured, provided that for every odd set $X$ of vertices, there are at least $d$ edges between $X$ and its complement. For $d = 3$ this is the four-colour theorem, and the conjecture has been proved for all $d\le 8$, by various authors. In particular, two of us proved it when $d=7$; and then three of us proved it when $d=8$. The methods used for the latter give a proof in the $d=7$ case that is simpler than the original, and we present it here.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access