Paper detail

Computer aided solution of the invariance equation for two-variable Gini means

Our aim is to solve the so-called invariance equation in the class of two-variable Gini means ${G_{p,q}:p,q\in\R}$, i.e., to find necessary and sufficient conditions on the 6 parameters $a,b,c,d,p,q$ such that the identity [G_{p,q}\big(G_{a,b}(x,y),G_{c,d}(x,y)\big)=G_{p,q}(x,y) \qquad (x,y \in \R_+)] be valid. We recall that, for $p\neq q$, the Gini mean $G_{p,q}$ is defined by [G_{p,q}(x,y):=(\dfrac{x^p+y^p}{x^q+y^q})^{\frac1{p-q}}\qquad (x,y \in \R_+).] The proof uses the computer algebra system Maple V Release 9 to compute a Taylor expansion up to 12th order, which enables us to describe all the cases of the equality.

preprint2012arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.