Paper detail

Computationally Efficient Nonparametric Importance Sampling

The variance reduction established by importance sampling strongly depends on the choice of the importance sampling distribution. A good choice is often hard to achieve especially for high-dimensional integration problems. Nonparametric estimation of the optimal importance sampling distribution (known as nonparametric importance sampling) is a reasonable alternative to parametric approaches.In this article nonparametric variants of both the self-normalized and the unnormalized importance sampling estimator are proposed and investigated. A common critique on nonparametric importance sampling is the increased computational burden compared to parametric methods. We solve this problem to a large degree by utilizing the linear blend frequency polygon estimator instead of a kernel estimator. Mean square error convergence properties are investigated leading to recommendations for the efficient application of nonparametric importance sampling. Particularly, we show that nonparametric importance sampling asymptotically attains optimal importance sampling variance. The efficiency of nonparametric importance sampling algorithms heavily relies on the computational efficiency of the employed nonparametric estimator. The linear blend frequency polygon outperforms kernel estimators in terms of certain criteria such as efficient sampling and evaluation. Furthermore, it is compatible with the inversion method for sample generation. This allows to combine our algorithms with other variance reduction techniques such as stratified sampling. Empirical evidence for the usefulness of the suggested algorithms is obtained by means of three benchmark integration problems. As an application we estimate the distribution of the queue length of a spam filter queueing system based on real data.

preprint2008arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.