Paper detail

Computational issues and numerical experiments for Linear Multistep Method Particle Filtering

The Linear Multistep Method Particle Filter (LMM PF) is a method for predicting the evolution in time of a evolutionary system governed by a system of differential equations. If some of the parameters of the governing equations are unknowns, it is possible to organize the calculations so as to estimate them while following the evolution of the system in time. The underlying assumption in the approach that we present is that all unknowns are modelled as random variables, where the randomness is an indication of the uncertainty of their values rather than an intrinsic property of the quantities. Consequently, the states of the system and the parameters are described in probabilistic terms by their density, often in the form of representative samples. This approach is particularly attractive in the context of parameter estimation inverse problems, because the statistical formulation naturally provides a means of assessing the uncertainty in the solution via the spread of the distribution. The computational efficiency of the underlying sampling technique is crucial for the success of the method, because the accuracy of the solution depends on the ability to produce representative samples from the distribution of the unknown parameters. In this paper LMM PF is tested on a skeletal muscle metabolism problem, which was previously treated within the Ensemble Kalman filtering framework. Here numerical evidences are used to highlight the correlation between the main sources of errors and the influence of the linera multistep method adopted. Finally, we analyzed the effect of replacing LMM with Runge-Kutta class integration methods for supporting the PF technique.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access5 authors3 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.