Paper detail

Computational-Experimental Investigation of a Fission Thermal Probe in TREAT

The development of nuclear fuels requires unsteady/transient testing for design process and qualification under postulated accident conditions. Breach, rupture, fracture, melting, and other fuel failure modes may occur during the use of nuclear fuels or when they are exposed to extreme overpower conditions. Therefore, it is crucial for the fuel to retain reasonable structural integrity and coolable geometry. The experimental facility of Transient Reactor Test (TREAT) was designed and constructed in November 1958 to conduct transient testing of fuels and structural materials. The magnitude of nuclear heating is one of the most important key parameters in test design, analysis, and data interpretation in TREAT. Some steady-state tests are able to measure heating directly via enthalpy rise of coolant in thermally-isolated loops, but an enormous number of important tests must rely upon nuclear modeling to correlate core operating parameters to specimen nuclear heating. Uncertainties of these models and their inputs can prevent experimenters from achieving desired conditions and hamper advanced models from describing the phenomena to the level of confidence needed. The situation can be even more difficult for unsteady/transient tests where nuclear heating is intentionally varied over short time scales. This research develops a novel nuclear heating sensor technology which directly measures the parameters of interest using spatially-resolved real-time thermometry of fissionable instrument materials, demonstrate the instruments' use in TREAT, and perform data comparisons to nuclear models to facilitate an advanced understanding of transient power coupling. Here we present our results of the designed probe and its testing outcome.

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access6 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.