Paper detail

Computation of ancestry scores with mixed families and unrelated individuals

The issue of robustness to family relationships in computing genotype ancestry scores such as eigenvector projections has received increased attention in genetic association, as the scores are widely used to control spurious association. We use a motivational example from the North American Cystic Fibrosis (CF) Consortium genetic association study with 3444 individuals and 898 family members to illustrate the challenge of computing ancestry scores when sets of both unrelated individuals and closely-related family members are included. We propose novel methods to obtain ancestry scores and demonstrate that the proposed methods outperform existing methods. The current standard is to compute loadings (left singular vectors) using unrelated individuals and to compute projected scores for remaining family members. However, projected ancestry scores from this approach suffer from shrinkage toward zero. We consider in turn alternate strategies: (i) within-family data orthogonalization, (ii) matrix substitution based on decomposition of a target family-orthogonalized covariance matrix, (iii) covariance-preserving whitening, retaining covariances between unrelated pairs while orthogonalizing family members, and (iv) using family-averaged data to obtain loadings. Except for within-family orthogonalization, our proposed approaches offer similar performance and are superior to the standard approaches. We illustrate the performance via simulation and analysis of the CF dataset.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.