Paper detail

Compositional phase stability of correlated electron materials within DFT+DMFT

Predicting the compositional phase stability of strongly correlated electron materials is an outstanding challenge in condensed matter physics, requiring precise computations of total energies. In this work, we employ the density functional theory plus dynamical mean-field theory (DFT+DMFT) formalism to address local correlations due to transition metal d electrons on compositional phase stability in the prototype rechargeable battery cathode material LixCoO2, and detailed comparisons are made with the simpler DFT+U approach (i.e. the Hartree-Fock solution of the DMFT impurity problem). Local interactions are found to strongly impact the energetics of the band insulator LiCoO2, most significantly via the Eg orbitals, which are partially occupied via hybridization with O p states. We find CoO2 and Li1/2CoO2 to be moderately correlated Fermi liquids with quasiparticle weights of 0.6-0.8 for the T2g states, which are most impacted by the interactions. As compared to DFT+U, DFT+DMFT considerably dampens the increase in total energy as U is increased, which indicates that dynamical correlations are important to describe this class of materials despite the relatively modest quasiparticle weights. Unlike DFT+U, which can incorrectly drive LixCoO2 towards spurious phase separating or charge ordered states, DFT+DMFT correctly captures the system's phase stability and does not exhibit a strong charge ordering tendency. Most importantly, the error within DFT+U varies strongly as the composition changes, challenging the common practice of artificially tuning U within DFT+U to compensate the errors of Hartree-Fock. DFT+DMFT predicts the average intercalation voltage decreases relative to DFT, opposite to the result of DFT+U, which would yield favorable agreement with experiment in conjunction with the overprediction of the voltage by the strongly constrained and appropriately normed DFT functional.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.