Paper detail

Complexity analysis of Cylindrically Symmetric Self-gravitating Dynamical System in $f(R,T)$ Theory of Gravity

In this article, we have studied a cylindrically symmetric self-gravitating dynamical object via complexity factor which is obtained through orthogonal splitting of Reimann tensor in $f(R,T)$ theory of gravity. Our study is based on the definition of complexity for dynamical sources, proposed by Herrera \cite{12b}. We actually want to analyze the behavior of complexity factor for cylindrically symmetric dynamical source in modified theory. For this, we define the scalar functions through orthogonal splitting of Reimann tensor in $f(R,T)$ gravity and work out structure scalars for cylindrical geometry. We evaluated the complexity of the structure and also analyzed the complexity of the evolutionary patterns of the system under consideration. In order to present simplest mode of evolution, we explored homologous condition and homogeneous expansion condition in $f(R,T)$ gravity and discussed dynamics and kinematics in the background of a generic viable non-minimally coupled $f(R,T)=α_1 R^m T^n +α_2 T(1+α_3 T^p R^q)$ model. In order to make a comprehensive analysis, we considered three different cases (representing both minimal and non-minimal coupling) of the model under consideration and found that complexity of a system is increased in the presence of higher order curvature terms, even in the simplest modes of evolution. However, higher order trace terms affects the complexity of the system but they are not crucial for simplest modes of evolution in the case of minimal coupling. The stability of vanishing of complexity factor has also been discussed.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.