Paper detail

Competing with oneself: Introducing self-interaction in a model of competitive learning

A competitive learning model was introduced in Ref. 1 (A. Mehta and J. M. Luck, Phys. Rev. E 60, 5, 1999), in which the learning is outcome-related. Every individual chooses between a pair of existing strategies or types, guided by a combination of two factors: tendency to conform to the local majority, \em{and} a preference for the type with higher perceived success \em{among its neighbors}, based on their relative outcomes. Here, an extension of the \em{interfacial model} of Ref. 1 is proposed, in which individuals additionally take into account their \em{own} outcomes in arriving at their outcome-based choices. Three possible update rules for handling bulk sites are considered. The corresponding phase diagrams, obtained at coexistence, show systematic departures from the original interfacial model. Possible relationships of these variants with the \em{cooperative model} of Ref. 1 are also touched upon.

preprint2010arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.