Paper detail

Competing contact processes in the Watts-Strogatz network

We investigate two competing contact processes on a set of Watts--Strogatz networks with the clustering coefficient tuned by rewiring. The base for network construction is one-dimensional chain of $N$ sites, where each site $i$ is directly linked to nodes labelled as $i\pm 1$ and $i\pm 2$. So initially, each node has the same degree $k_i=4$. The periodic boundary conditions are assumed as well. For each node $i$ the links to sites $i+1$ and $i+2$ are rewired to two randomly selected nodes so far not-connected to node $i$. An increase of the rewiring probability $q$ influences the nodes degree distribution and the network clusterization coefficient $\mathcal{C}$. For given values of rewiring probability $q$ the set $\mathcal{N}(q)=\{\mathcal{N}_1, \mathcal{N}_2, \cdots, \mathcal{N}_M \}$ of $M$ networks is generated. The network's nodes are decorated with spin-like variables $s_i\in\{S,D\}$. During simulation each $S$ node having a $D$-site in its neighbourhood converts this neighbour from $D$ to $S$ state. Conversely, a node in $D$ state having at least one neighbour also in state $D$-state converts all nearest-neighbours of this pair into $D$-state. The latter is realized with probability $p$. We plot the dependence of the nodes $S$ final density $n_S^T$ on initial nodes $S$ fraction $n_S^0$. Then, we construct the surface of the unstable fixed points in $(\mathcal{C}, p, n_S^0)$ space. The system evolves more often toward $n_S^T=1$ for $(\mathcal{C}, p, n_S^0)$ points situated above this surface while starting simulation with $(\mathcal{C}, p, n_S^0)$ parameters situated below this surface leads system to $n_S^T=0$. The points on this surface correspond to such value of initial fraction $n_S^*$ of $S$ nodes (for fixed values $\mathcal{C}$ and $p$) for which their final density is $n_S^T=\frac{1}{2}$.

preprint2015arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.