Paper detail

Compatible and Usable Mandatory Access Control for Good-enough OS Security

OS compromise is one of the most serious computer security problems today, but still not being resolved. Although people proposed different kinds of methods, they could not be accepted by most users who are non-expert due to the lack of compatibility and usability. In this paper, we introduce a kind of new mandatory access control model, named CUMAC, that aims to achieve good-enough security, high compatibility and usability. It has two novel features. One is access control based on tracing potential intrusion that can reduce false negatives and facilitate security configuration, in order to improve both compatibility and usability; the other is automatically figuring out all of the compatibility exceptions that usually incurs incompatible problems. The experiments performed on the prototype show that CUMAC can defense attacks from network, mobile disk and local untrustable users while keeping good compatibility and usability.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.