Paper detail

Compatibility of linear-response theory with the Second Law of Thermodynamics and the emergence of negative entropy production rates

The reliability of physical theories depends on whether they agree with well established physical laws. In this work, we address the compatibility of the Hamiltonian formulation of linear-response theory with the Second Law of Thermodynamics. In order to do so, we verify three complementary aspects often understood as statements of the Second Law: 1. No dissipation for quasistatic process; 2. Dissipation for finite-time processes; 3. Positive entropy production rate. Our analysis focus on two classes of nonequilibrium isothermal processes: slowly-varying and finite-time but weak ones. For the former, we show that these aspects are easily verified. For the later, we present conditions for the achievement of the first two aspects. We also show that the third one is not always verified, presenting an example based on Brownian motion in which we observe negative values in the entropy production rate. In particular, we compare linear-response and exact results for this example.

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.