Paper detail

Comparison of the performance of high-order schemes based on the gas-kinetic and HLLC fluxes

In this paper, a comparison of the performance of two high-order finite volume methods based on the gas-kinetic scheme (GKS) and HLLC fluxes is carried out in structured rectangular mesh. For both schemes, the fifth-order WENO-AO reconstruction is adopted to achieve a high-order spatial accuracy. In terms of temporal discretization, a two-stage fourth-order (S2O4) time marching strategy is adopted for WENO5-AO-GKS scheme, and the fourth-order Runge-Kutta (RK4) method is employed for WENO5-AO-HLLC scheme. For the viscous flow computation, the GKS includes both inviscid and viscous fluxes in the evolution of a single cell interface gas distribution function. While for the WENO5-AO-HLLC scheme, the inviscid flux is provided by HLLC Riemann solver, and the viscous flux is discretized by a sixth-order central difference method. Based on the tests of forward Mach step and viscous shock tube, both schemes show outstanding shock capturing property. From the Titarev-Toro and double shear layer tests, WENO5-AO-GKS scheme seems to have a better resolution than WENO5-AO-HLLC scheme. Both schemes show excellent robustness in extreme cases, such as the Le Blanc problem. From the cases of the Noh problem and the compressible isotropic turbulence, WENO5-AO-GKS scheme shows favorite robustness. In the compressible isotropic turbulence and three-dimensional Taylor-Green vortex problems, WENO-AO-GKS can use a CFL number up to 0.5, instead of 0.3 for WENO5-AO-HLLC. In terms of computational efficiency, WENO5-AO-HLLC scheme is about 27% more expensive than WENO5-AO-GKS scheme in the two-dimensional viscous flow problems, but is about 15% faster in the three-dimensional case. Due to the multi-dimensionality, WENO5-AO-GKS scheme performs better than WENO5-AO-HLLC scheme in the laminar boundary layer and the double shear layer test.