Researcher profile

Xiaojian Yang

Xiaojian Yang contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 17 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
4works
0followers
2topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

4 published item(s)

preprint2022arXiv

UGKWP for three-dimensional simulation of gas-particle fluidized bed

The gas-solid particle two-phase flow in a fluidized bed shows complex physics. Following our previous work, the multi-scale framework based on gas-kinetic scheme (GKS) and unified gas-kinetic wave-particle method (UGKWP) for the gas-particle system is firstly extended to the three-dimensional simulation of the fluidized bed. For the solid particle evolution, different from the widely-used Eulerian and Lagrangian approaches, the UGKWP unifies the wave (dense particle region) and discrete particle (dilute particle region) formulation seamlessly according to a continuous variation of particle cell's Kundsen number ($Kn$). The GKS-UGKWP for the coupled gas-particle evolution system can automatically become an Eulerian-Eulerian (EE) method in the high particle collision regime and Eulerian-Lagrangian (EL) formulation in the collisionless particle regime. In the transition regime, the UGKWP can achieve a smooth transition between the Eulerian and Lagrangian limiting formulation. More importantly, the weights of mass distributions from analytical wave and discrete particle are related to the local $Kn$ by $\exp(-1/Kn)$ for wave and $(1-\exp(-1/Kn))$ for discrete particle. As a result, the UGKWP provides an optimal modeling for capturing the particle phase in terms of physical accuracy and numerical efficiency. In the numerical simulation, the UGKWP does not need any prior division of dilute/dense regions, which makes it suitable for the fluidized bed problem, where the dilute/transition/dense regions instantaneously coexist and are dynamically interconvertible. In this paper, based on the GKS-UGKWP formulation two lab-scale fluidization cases are simulated in 3D and the simulation results are compared with the experimental measurements. The typical heterogeneous flow features of the fluidized bed are well captured and the statistics are in good agreement with experiment data.

preprint2021arXiv

Unified gas-kinetic wave-particle method for gas-particle two phase flow from dilute to dense solid-particle limit

In this paper, a unified framework for particulate two-phase flow will be presented with a wide range of solid-particle concentration from dilute to dense limit. The two phase flow is simulated by two coupled flow solvers, i.e., the gas-kinetic scheme (GKS) for the gas phase and unified gas-kinetic wave-particle method (UGKWP) for the particle phase. The GKS is a second-order Navier-Stokes flow solver for the continuum flow. The UGKWP is a multiscale method for all flow regimes. The wave and particle decomposition in UGKWP depends on the cell's Knudsen number (Kn). At a small Kn number, the high concentrated solid particle phase will be modeled by the Eulerian hydrodynamic wave due to the intensive particle-particle collisions. At a large Kn number, the dilute solid particle will be sampled and followed by the Lagrangian particle formulation to capture the non-equilibrium transport. In the transition regime, the distribution and evolution of particle and wave in UGKWP are controlled by the local Kn number with a smooth transition between the above limits. In the current scheme, the two phase model improves the previous one in all following aspects: drag force model for different solid particle concentrations; the frictional pressure in inter-particle contacts at high solid-particle concentration; a flux limiting model to avoid solid particles' over-packing; additional non-conservative nozzle and work terms for the gas phase. Besides, the inter-particle collisions have been refined numerically for the dense particle flow through the discretization of the collision term and numerical flux function. The numerical scheme is tested in a series of typical gas-particle problems. The results validate the accuracy and reliability of the proposed method for gas-particle flow.

preprint2021arXiv

Unified gas-kinetic wave-particle methods VI: Disperse dilute gas-particle multiphase flow

In this paper, a unified gas-kinetic wave-particle scheme (UGKWP) for the disperse dilute gas-particle multiphase flow is proposed. The gas phase is always in the hydrodynamic regime. However, the particle phase covers different flow regimes from particle trajectory crossing to the hydrodynamic wave interaction with the variation of local particle phase Knudsen number. The UGKWP is an appropriate method for the capturing of the multiscale transport mechanism in the particle phase through its coupled wave-particle formulation. In the regime with intensive particle collision, the evolution of solid particle will be followed by the analytic wave with quasi-equilibrium distribution; while in the rarefied regime the non-equilibrium particle phase will be captured through particle tracking and collision, which plays a decisive role in recovering particle trajectory crossing behavior. The gas-kinetic scheme (GKS) is employed for the simulation of gas flow. In the highly collision regime for the particles, no particles will be sampled in UGKWP and the wave formulation for solid particle with the hydrodynamic gas phase will reduce the system to the two-fluid Eulerian model. On the other hand, in the collisionless regime for the solid particle, the free transport of solid particle will be followed in UGKWP, and coupled system will return to the Eulerian-Lagrangian formulation for the gas and particle. The scheme will be tested for in all flow regimes, which include the non-equilibrium particle trajectory crossing, the particle concentration under different Knudsen number, and the dispersion of particle flow with the variation of Stokes number. A experiment of shock-induced particle bed fluidization is simulated and the results are compared with experimental measurements. These numerical solutions validate suitability of the proposed scheme for the simulation of gas-particle multiphase flow.

preprint2020arXiv

Comparison of the performance of high-order schemes based on the gas-kinetic and HLLC fluxes

In this paper, a comparison of the performance of two high-order finite volume methods based on the gas-kinetic scheme (GKS) and HLLC fluxes is carried out in structured rectangular mesh. For both schemes, the fifth-order WENO-AO reconstruction is adopted to achieve a high-order spatial accuracy. In terms of temporal discretization, a two-stage fourth-order (S2O4) time marching strategy is adopted for WENO5-AO-GKS scheme, and the fourth-order Runge-Kutta (RK4) method is employed for WENO5-AO-HLLC scheme. For the viscous flow computation, the GKS includes both inviscid and viscous fluxes in the evolution of a single cell interface gas distribution function. While for the WENO5-AO-HLLC scheme, the inviscid flux is provided by HLLC Riemann solver, and the viscous flux is discretized by a sixth-order central difference method. Based on the tests of forward Mach step and viscous shock tube, both schemes show outstanding shock capturing property. From the Titarev-Toro and double shear layer tests, WENO5-AO-GKS scheme seems to have a better resolution than WENO5-AO-HLLC scheme. Both schemes show excellent robustness in extreme cases, such as the Le Blanc problem. From the cases of the Noh problem and the compressible isotropic turbulence, WENO5-AO-GKS scheme shows favorite robustness. In the compressible isotropic turbulence and three-dimensional Taylor-Green vortex problems, WENO-AO-GKS can use a CFL number up to 0.5, instead of 0.3 for WENO5-AO-HLLC. In terms of computational efficiency, WENO5-AO-HLLC scheme is about 27% more expensive than WENO5-AO-GKS scheme in the two-dimensional viscous flow problems, but is about 15% faster in the three-dimensional case. Due to the multi-dimensionality, WENO5-AO-GKS scheme performs better than WENO5-AO-HLLC scheme in the laminar boundary layer and the double shear layer test.