Paper detail

Comparison of the Hole Concentration determined by Transport Measurement for the Hole-doped Cuprate Superconductors

We have compared the hole concentration ($P_{pl}$) determined by hole-scale based on the thermoelectric power at RT ($S^{290}$) to the hole concentrations ($P$) determined by two popular hole-scales based on the superconducting critical temperature ($T_c$) and Hall coefficient ($R_H$). While the hole concentrations based on different hole-scales are different, we show that when the $P_{pl}$ is divided by either the effective unit cell volume ($V_{euc}$) which is the unit-cell volume per one CuO$_2$ plane or the optimal hole concentration ($P_{pl}^{opt}$) we can find some correlation between $P_{pl}$ and $P$. That is, the normalized $T_c$ ($T_c$ / $T_c$($P_{pl}^{opt}$)) and the Hall number (1/$eR_H$) are well scaled with $P_{pl}$ / $P_{pl}^{opt}$ and $P_{pl}$ / $V_{euc}$, respectively. We find that the $P_{pl}$-scale can map to and reproduce the other two hole scales if proper dimensionality and normalization are taken into account but not vice versa.

preprint2009arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.