Paper detail

Comparison of SCIPUFF Plume Prediction with Particle Filter Assimilated Prediction for Dipole Pride 26 Data

This paper presents the application of a particle filter for data assimilation in the context of puff-based dispersion models. Particle filters provide estimates of the higher moments, and are well suited for strongly nonlinear and/or non-Gaussian models. The Gaussian puff model SCIPUFF, is used in predicting the chemical concentration field after a chemical incident. This model is highly nonlinear and evolves with variable state dimension and, after sufficient time, high dimensionality. While the particle filter formalism naturally supports variable state dimensionality high dimensionality represents a challenge in selecting an adequate number of particles, especially for the Bootstrap version. We present an implementation of the Bootstrap particle filter and compare its performance with the SCIPUFF predictions. Both the model and the Particle Filter are evaluated on the Dipole Pride 26 experimental data. Since there is no available ground truth, the data has been divided in two sets: training and testing. We show that even with a modest number of particles, the Bootstrap particle filter provides better estimates of the concentration field compared with the process model, without excessive increase in computational complexity.

preprint2011arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.