Paper detail

Comparison of non-parametric global envelopes

This study presents a simulation study to compare different non-parametric global envelopes that are refinements of the rank envelope proposed by Myllymäki et al. (2017, Global envelope tests for spatial processes, J. R. Statist. Soc. B 79, 381-404, doi: 10.1111/rssb.12172). The global envelopes are constructed for a set of functions or vectors. For a large number of vectors, all the refinements lead to the same outcome as the global rank envelope. For smaller numbers of vectors the refinement playes a role, where different refinements are sensitive to different types of extremeness of a vector among the set of vectors. The performance of the different alternatives are compared in a simulation study with respect to the numbers of available vectors, the dimensionality of the vectors, the amount of dependence between the vector elements and the expected type of extremeness.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.