Paper detail

Comparison of AATR and WTEC indices in the studies of the level of ionospheric disturbance

A comparative statistical analysis of AATR and WTEC indices was conducted based on data from the ISTP SB RAS GNSS receivers network. It is shown that at high levels of ionospheric disturbance (for WTEC > 0.1 TECU), the AATR index is proportional to the WTEC index with a factor of $1.5min^{-1}$. At small levels of ionospheric disturbance (for WTEC < 0.1 TECU), this proportionality is violated. It is shown that the contribution of daily dynamics of the background ionosphere to the AATR index is higher than to the WTEC index. This leads to a higher sensitivity of the WTEC index to disturbances. This also leads to violating the proportionality between WTEC and AATR indices at low levels of ionospheric disturbance. It is shown that at high latitudes the dynamics of the WTEC and AATR indices correlate significantly with the level of geomagnetic disturbance Kp. At mid-latitudes, the contribution of solar radiation variations (F10.7 index) and vertical seismic variations exceeds the influence of Kp variations. The program for calculating WTEC indices, used in the paper is put into open access.

preprint2019arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors3 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.