Paper detail

Comparison between $Fermi$ Detected and non-$Fermi$ Detected Superluminal Sources

Active galactic nuclei (AGNs) have been attracting research attention due to their special observable properties. Specifically, a majority of AGNs are detected by Fermi-LAT missions, but not by Fermi-LAT, which raises the question of whether any differences exist between the two. To answer this issue, we compile a sample of 291 superluminal AGNs (189 FDSs and 102 non-FDSs) from available multi-wavelength radio, optical, and X-ray (or even $γ$-ray) data and Doppler factors and proper motion ($μ$) (or apparent velocity ($β_{\rm{app}}$)); calculated the apparent velocity from their proper motion, Lorentz factor ($Γ$), viewing angle ($ϕ$) and co-moving viewing angle ($ϕ_{co}$) for the sources with available Doppler factor ($δ$); and performed some statistical analyses for both types. Our study indicated that1. In terms of average values, FDSs have higher proper motions ($μ$), apparent velocities ($β_{\rm app}$), Doppler factor ($δ$), Lorentz factor ($Γ$), and smaller viewing angle ($ϕ$). Nevertheless, there is no clear difference in co-moving viewing angles ($ϕ_{\rm co}$).

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.