Source author record

Denise Costantin

Explore this author’s publications, collaborators and research topics. This catalog record has not been claimed by its author.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record

astro-ph.HE

Catalog footprint

Research overview

2works

1topics

4close collaborators

Actions

Is this your work?

Open graph Browse papers

preprint2020arXiv

Comparison between $Fermi$ Detected and non- $Fermi$ Detected Superluminal Sources

Active galactic nuclei (AGNs) have been attracting research attention due to their special observable properties. Specifically, a majority of AGNs are detected by Fermi-LAT missions, but not by Fermi-LAT, which raises the question of whether any differences exist between the two. To answer this issue, we compile a sample of 291 superluminal AGNs (189 FDSs and 102 non-FDSs) from available multi-wavelength radio, optical, and X-ray (or even $γ$ -ray) data and Doppler factors and proper motion ( $μ$ ) (or apparent velocity ( $β_{\rm{app}}$ )); calculated the apparent velocity from their proper motion, Lorentz factor ( $Γ$ ), viewing angle ( $ϕ$ ) and co-moving viewing angle ( $ϕ_{co}$ ) for the sources with available Doppler factor ( $δ$ ); and performed some statistical analyses for both types. Our study indicated that1. In terms of average values, FDSs have higher proper motions ( $μ$ ), apparent velocities ( $β_{\rm app}$ ), Doppler factor ( $δ$ ), Lorentz factor ( $Γ$ ), and smaller viewing angle ( $ϕ$ ). Nevertheless, there is no clear difference in co-moving viewing angles ( $ϕ_{\rm co}$ ).

preprint2020arXiv

Efficient Fermi Source Identification with Machine Learning Methods

In this work, Machine Learning (ML) methods are used to efficiently identify the unassociated sources and the Blazar Candidate of Uncertain types (BCUs) in the Fermi-LAT Third Source Catalog (3FGL). The aims are twofold: 1) to distinguish the Active Galactic Nuclei (AGNs) from others (non-AGNs) in the unassociated sources; 2) to identify BCUs into BL Lacertae objects (BL Lacs) or Flat Spectrum Radio Quasars (FSRQs). Two dimensional reduction methods are presented to decrease computational complexity, where Random Forest (RF), Multilayer Perceptron (MLP) and Generative Adversarial Nets (GAN) are trained as individual models. In order to achieve better performance, the ensemble technique is further explored. It is also demonstrated that grid search method is of help to choose the hyper-parameters of models and decide the final predictor, by which we have identified 748 AGNs out of 1010 unassociated sources, with an accuracy of 97.04%. Within the 573 BCUs, 326 have been identified as BL Lacs and 247 as FSRQs, with an accuracy of 92.13%.

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Denise Costantin

Research overview

Is this your work?

2 publications

Comparison between $Fermi$ Detected and non- $Fermi$ Detected Superluminal Sources

Efficient Fermi Source Identification with Machine Learning Methods

See the researcher in context

Building this map preview

Denise Costantin

Research overview

Is this your work?

2 publications

Comparison between FermiFermiFermi Detected and non-FermiFermiFermi Detected Superluminal Sources

Efficient Fermi Source Identification with Machine Learning Methods

See the researcher in context

Building this map preview

Comparison between $Fermi$ Detected and non- $Fermi$ Detected Superluminal Sources