Paper detail

Comparing secondary structures of RNA and calculating the free energy of an interior loop using a novel method for calculating free energy

The thesis consists of two projects. In the first project, we present a software that analyses RNA secondary structures and compares them. The goal of this software is to find the differences between two secondary structures (experimental or predicted) in order to improve or compare algorithms for predicting secondary structures. Then, a comparison between secondary structures predicted by the Vienna package to those found experimentally is presented and cases in which there exists a difference between the prediction and the experimental structure are identified. As the differences originate mainly from faces and hydrogen bonds that are not allowed by the Vienna package, it is suggested that prediction may be improved by integrating them into the software. In the second project we calculate the free energy of an interior loop using Monte-Carlo simulation. We first present a semi-coarse grained model for interior loops of RNA, and the energy model for the different interactions. We then introduce the Monte-Carlo simulations and the method of Parallel Tempering which enables good sampling of configuration space by simulating a system simultaneously at several temperatures. Next we present Thermodynamic Integration, which is a method for calculating free energy differences. Then, We introduce a method that calculates the free energy significantly faster since we need to use only one parameter, $T$. To implement this method, we had to reach a regime in which the partition functions of the two systems are equal, which isn't satisfied for systems that have different entropies in the high temperature limit, so a solution to this problem had to be found. Free energy values calculated for various interior loops are shown, and may, if verified or with a more realistic modelling, be integrated into the Vienna package and supply an alternative to the experiments done.

preprint2012arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author3 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Authors

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.