Paper detail

Comparing H.265/HEVC and VP9: Impact of High Frame Rates on the Perceptual Quality of Compressed Videos

High frame rates have been known to enhance the perceived visual quality of specific video content. However, the lack of investigation of high frame rates has restricted the expansion of this research field particularly in the context of full-high-definition (FHD) and 4K ultra-high-definition video formats. This study involves a subjective and objective quality assessment of compressed FHD videos. First, we compress the FHD videos by employing high-efficiency video coding, and VP9 at five quantization parameter levels for multiple frame rates, i.e., 15fps, 30fps, and 60fps. The FHD videos are obtained from a high frame-rate video database BVI-HFR, spanning various scenes, colors, and motions, and are shown to be representative of the BBC broadcast content. Second, a detailed subjective quality assessment of compressed videos for both encoders and individual frame rates is conducted, resulting in subjective measurements in the form of the differential mean opinion score reflecting the quality of experience. In particular, the aim is to investigate the impact of compression on the perceptual quality of compressed FHD videos and compare the performance of both encoders for each frame rate. Finally, 11 state-of-the-art objective quality assessment metrics are benchmarked using the subjective measurements, to investigate the correlation as a statistical evaluation between the two models in terms of correlation coefficients. A recommendation for enhancing the quality estimation of full-reference (FR) video quality measurements (VQMs) is presented after the extensive investigation.

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.