Paper detail

Comparing A^1-h-cobordism and A^1-weak equivalence

We study the problem of classifying projectivizations of rank-two vector bundles over ${\mathbb P}^2$ up to various notions of equivalence that arise naturally in ${\mathbb A}^1$-homotopy theory, namely ${\mathbb A}^1$-weak equivalence and ${\mathbb A}^1$-$h$-cobordism. First, we classify such varieties up to ${\mathbb A}^1$-weak equivalence: over algebraically closed fields having characteristic unequal to two the classification can be given in terms of characteristic classes of the underlying vector bundle. When the base field is ${\mathbb C}$, this classification result can be compared to a corresponding topological result and we find that the algebraic and topological homotopy classifications agree. Second, we study the problem of classifying such varieties up to ${\mathbb A}^1$-$h$-cobordism using techniques of deformation theory. To this end, we establish a deformation rigidity result for ${\mathbb P}^1$-bundles over ${\mathbb P}^2$ which links ${\mathbb A}^1$-$h$-cobordisms to deformations of the underlying vector bundles. Using results from the deformation theory of vector bundles we show that if $X$ is a ${\mathbb P}^1$-bundle over ${\mathbb P}^2$ and $Y$ is the projectivization of a direct sum of line bundles on ${\mathbb P}^2$, then if $X$ is ${\mathbb A}^1$-weakly equivalent to $Y$, $X$ is also ${\mathbb A}^1$-$h$-cobordant to $Y$. Finally, we discuss some subtleties inherent in the definition of ${\mathbb A}^1$-$h$-cobordism. We show, for instance, that direct ${\mathbb A}^1$-$h$-cobordism fails to be an equivalence relation.

preprint2014arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors3 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.