Comparative study of the direct α+dα+d →\rightarrow 6^6Li + γγ astrophysical capture reaction in few-body models

preprint2019arXivOpen access

Abstract

A comparative analysis of the astrophysical S factor and the reaction rate for the direct α(d,γ)6Li α(d,γ)^{6}{\rm Li} capture reaction, and the primordial abundance of the 6^6Li element, resulting from two-body, three-body and combined cluster models is presented. It is shown that the two-body model, based on the exact-mass prescription, can not correctly describe the dependence of the isospin-forbidden E1 S factor on energy and does not reproduce the temperature dependence of the reaction rate from the direct LUNA data. It is demonstrated that the isospin-forbidden E1 astrophysical S factor is very sensitive to the orthogonalization procedure of Pauli-forbidden states within the three-body model. On the other hand, the E2 S factor does not depend on the orthogonalization method. This insures that the orthogonolizing pseudopotentials method yields a very good description of the LUNA collaboration's low-energy direct data. At the same time, the SUSY transformation significantly underestimates the data from the LUNA collaboration. On the other hand, the energy dependence of the E1 S factor are the same in both methods. The best description of the LUNA data for the astrophysical S factor and the reaction rates is obtained within the combined E1(three-body OPP)+E2(two-body) model. It yields a value of (0.72±0.01)×10−14(0.72 \pm 0.01) \times 10^{-14} for the 6^6Li/H primordial abundance ratio, consistent with the estimation (0.80±0.18)×10−14(0.80 \pm 0.18) \times 10^{-14} of the LUNA collaboration. For the 6Li/7Li^6{\rm Li}/^7{\rm Li} abundance ratio an estimation (1.40±0.12)×10−5(1.40\pm 0.12)\times 10^{-5} is obtained in good agreement with the Standard Model prediction.

Explore this paper’s authors, topics and related work.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Reviews 0

Write a reviewWrite

No reviews yet.

Discussion 0

Add a commentWrite

No comments yet.