Paper detail

Comparative study of high-spin isomers in semi-magic $Z$=50 isotopic and $N$=82 isotonic chains

We present a comparative study of the high-spin ${11/2}^-$, ${10}^+$ and ${27/2}^-$ nuclear isomers, observed commonly in the full semi-magic $Z=50$ isotopic and $N=82$ isotonic chains, which are found to display nearly identical systematics in excitation energy and half-lives. A constant and particle number independent energy gap of $\sim$ 4 MeV between the $0^+$ ground states and ${10}^+$ isomers and, the ${11/2}^-$ and ${27/2}^-$ isomers exists before the mid-shell, which declines near the mid-shell, and then becomes constant at $\sim$ 3 MeV after the mid-shell. Large scale shell model calculations are carried out for the full chains of Sn-isotopes and $N=82$ isotones, which reproduce the observed energy systematics reasonably well. The role of seniority, generalized seniority and alignment in the high-spin isomeric states as well as in the states populating the high spin isomers has been discussed. The empirical features suggest that the generalized seniority, known to be valid in the low lying states of even-even nuclei before the mid-shell, remains good up to the ${10}^+$ isomeric states; we further extend this interpretation to the odd-A nuclei before the mid-shell, particularly the ${27/2}^-$ isomers. The seniority becomes good after the mid-shell. The change in energy gap around the mid-shell, therefore, marks a transition from the generalized seniority regime to the seniority regime. From the alignment considerations, the high-spin isomers after the mid-shell emerge as maximally aligned decoupled states. We also note that the similar features of the isomeric half-lives in both the chains may be understood in terms of their similar seniorities and configurations. An overview of the $0^+$ to ${10}^+$ yrast states in the full chain of even-even Sn-isotopes has also been presented. We also make some predictions of possible new isomers based on the empirical systematics.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.