Paper detail

Comparative Bi-stochastizations and Associated Clusterings/Regionalizations of the 1995-2000 U. S. Intercounty Migration Network

Wang, Li and Konig have recently compared the cluster-theoretic properties of bi-stochasticized symmetric data similarity (e. g. kernel) matrices, produced by minimizing two different forms of Bregman divergences. We extend their investigation to non-symmetric matrices, specifically studying the 1995-2000 U. S. 3,107 x 3,107 intercounty migration matrix. A particular bi-stochastized form of it had been obtained (arXiv:1207.0437), using the well-established Sinkhorn-Knopp (SK) (biproportional) algorithm--which minimizes the Kullback-Leibler form of the divergence. This matrix has but a single entry equal to (the maximal possible value of) 1. Highly contrastingly, the bi-stochastic matrix obtained here, implementing the Wang-Li-Konig-algorithm for the minimum of the alternative, squared-norm form of the divergence, has 2,707 such unit entries. The corresponding 3,107-vertex, 2,707-link directed graph has 2,352 strong components. These consist of 1,659 single/isolated counties, 654 doublets (thirty-one interstate in nature), 22 triplets (one being interstate), 13 quartets (one being interstate), three quintets and one septet. Not manifest in these graph-theoretic results, however, are the five-county states of Hawaii and Rhode Island and the eight-county state of Connecticut. These--among other regional configurations--appealingly emerged as well-defined entities in the SK-based strong-component hierarchical clustering.

preprint2012arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author3 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.