Paper detail

Compact convex sets of the plane and probability theory

The Gauss-Minkowski correspondence in $\mathbb{R}^2$ states the existence of a homeomorphism between the probability measures $μ$ on $[0,2π]$ such that $\int_0^{2π} e^{ix}dμ(x)=0$ and the compact convex sets (CCS) of the plane with perimeter~1. In this article, we bring out explicit formulas relating the border of a CCS to its probability measure. As a consequence, we show that some natural operations on CCS -- for example, the Minkowski sum -- have natural translations in terms of probability measure operations, and reciprocally, the convolution of measures translates into a new notion of convolution of CCS. Additionally, we give a proof that a polygonal curve associated with a sample of $n$ random variables (satisfying $\int_0^{2π} e^{ix}dμ(x)=0$) converges to a CCS associated with $μ$ at speed $\sqrt{n}$, a result much similar to the convergence of the empirical process in statistics. Finally, we employ this correspondence to present models of smooth random CCS and simulations.

preprint2014arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.