Community detection thresholds and the weak Ramanujan property

preprint2013arXivOpen access

Abstract

Decelle et al.\cite{Decelle11} conjectured the existence of a sharp threshold for community detection in sparse random graphs drawn from the stochastic block model. Mossel et al.\cite{Mossel12} established the negative part of the conjecture, proving impossibility of meaningful detection below the threshold. However the positive part of the conjecture remained elusive so far. Here we solve the positive part of the conjecture. We introduce a modified adjacency matrix BB that counts self-avoiding paths of a given length ℓ\ell between pairs of nodes and prove that for logarithmic ℓ\ell, the leading eigenvectors of this modified matrix provide non-trivial detection, thereby settling the conjecture. A key step in the proof consists in establishing a {\em weak Ramanujan property} of matrix BB. Namely, the spectrum of BB consists in two leading eigenvalues ρ(B)ρ(B), λ2λ_2 and n−2n-2 eigenvalues of a lower order O(nερ(B))O(n^ε\sqrt{ρ(B)}) for all ε>0ε>0, ρ(B)ρ(B) denoting BB's spectral radius. dd-regular graphs are Ramanujan when their second eigenvalue verifies ∣λ∣≤2d−1|λ|\le 2 \sqrt{d-1}. Random dd-regular graphs have a second largest eigenvalue λλ of 2d−1+o(1)2\sqrt{d-1}+o(1) (see Friedman\cite{friedman08}), thus being {\em almost} Ramanujan. Erdős-Rényi graphs with average degree dd at least logarithmic (d=Ω(log⁡n)d=Ω(\log n)) have a second eigenvalue of O(d)O(\sqrt{d}) (see Feige and Ofek\cite{Feige05}), a slightly weaker version of the Ramanujan property. However this spectrum separation property fails for sparse (d=O(1)d=O(1)) Erdős-Rényi graphs. Our result thus shows that by constructing matrix BB through neighborhood expansion, we regularize the original adjacency matrix to eventually recover a weak form of the Ramanujan property.

Explore this paper’s authors, topics and related work.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Reviews 0

Write a reviewWrite

No reviews yet.

Discussion 0

Add a commentWrite

No comments yet.