Paper detail

Community detection thresholds and the weak Ramanujan property

Decelle et al.\cite{Decelle11} conjectured the existence of a sharp threshold for community detection in sparse random graphs drawn from the stochastic block model. Mossel et al.\cite{Mossel12} established the negative part of the conjecture, proving impossibility of meaningful detection below the threshold. However the positive part of the conjecture remained elusive so far. Here we solve the positive part of the conjecture. We introduce a modified adjacency matrix $B$ that counts self-avoiding paths of a given length $\ell$ between pairs of nodes and prove that for logarithmic $\ell$, the leading eigenvectors of this modified matrix provide non-trivial detection, thereby settling the conjecture. A key step in the proof consists in establishing a {\em weak Ramanujan property} of matrix $B$. Namely, the spectrum of $B$ consists in two leading eigenvalues $ρ(B)$, $λ_2$ and $n-2$ eigenvalues of a lower order $O(n^ε\sqrt{ρ(B)})$ for all $ε>0$, $ρ(B)$ denoting $B$'s spectral radius. $d$-regular graphs are Ramanujan when their second eigenvalue verifies $|λ|\le 2 \sqrt{d-1}$. Random $d$-regular graphs have a second largest eigenvalue $λ$ of $2\sqrt{d-1}+o(1)$ (see Friedman\cite{friedman08}), thus being {\em almost} Ramanujan. Erdős-Rényi graphs with average degree $d$ at least logarithmic ($d=Ω(\log n)$) have a second eigenvalue of $O(\sqrt{d})$ (see Feige and Ofek\cite{Feige05}), a slightly weaker version of the Ramanujan property. However this spectrum separation property fails for sparse ($d=O(1)$) Erdős-Rényi graphs. Our result thus shows that by constructing matrix $B$ through neighborhood expansion, we regularize the original adjacency matrix to eventually recover a weak form of the Ramanujan property.

preprint2013arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.