Paper detail

Communication Dynamics Neural Networks: FFT-Diagonalized Layers for Improved Hessian Conditioning at Reduced Parameter Count

Background and motivation. The Communication Dynamics (CD) framework, introduced in two earlier papers for atomic-energy prediction and field-induced superconductivity, treats each physical channel as a (2l+1)-vertex polygon whose discrete Fourier transform yields its energy spectrum. This paper applies the same circulant-spectral machinery to neural-network design. Layer construction. CDLinear is a block-circulant linear layer with block size B = 2l+1 and 1/B the parameter count of a dense layer of equal input/output dimensions. Three properties follow from the construction. (i) The Hessian of mean-squared loss with respect to the weights is diagonalized by the discrete Fourier transform, with eigenvalues |F[Xj](k)|^2 read directly from the input statistics (Theorem 1). (ii) Under input pre-whitening, the population Hessian condition number satisfies kappa = 1 exactly, with the empirical condition number bounded by 1+O(sqrt(B/N)) on N samples (Theorem 2). (iii) The Shannon noise rate alpha_CD = 0.0118 calibrated in the parent CD papers from the Na D-doublet specifies a transferable, non-arbitrary dropout rate. Empirical evaluation. A CDLinear MLP at B = 4 achieves 97.50% +/- 0.23% test accuracy with 2,380 parameters versus 98.15% +/- 0.47% for a parameter-matched dense MLP at 8,970 parameters, a 3.8x parameter reduction at 0.65% accuracy cost, within one standard deviation of the seed-to-seed spread. The CD-MLP mean Hessian condition number kappa = 1.9x10^4 is 310x smaller than the dense baseline kappa = 5.9x10^6, in quantitative agreement with Theorem 2.

preprint2026arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Authors

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.