Paper detail

Commissioning of the COBRA demonstrator and investigation of surface events as its main background

The COBRA collaboration investigates 0νββ-decays (neutrinoless double beta-decays). Therefore, a demonstrator setup using coplanar-grid CdZnTe detectors is operated at the LNGS underground laboratory. In this work, the demonstrator was commissioned and completed, which is discussed extensively. The demonstrator works reliably and collects low-background physics data. One result of the analysis of the data is that surface events are the dominating background component. To better understand and possibly discriminate this background, surface events were studied in detail. This was done mainly using laboratory measurements. For a better interpretation of these measurements, simulations of particle trajectories and ranges were done. The surface sensitivity tests showed large differences between the individual detectors. Often, a dead-layer was determined, especially at the surfaces where the non-collecting anode (NCA) is the outermost anode rail. Due to this, the sensitivity of the surfaces where the collecting anode (CA) is adjacent was typically about a factor of three larger than the NCA sensitivity. A comparison of the pulse shape analysis methods LSE and A/E was done. Laboratory measurements indicate, that the latter performs better. Alpha scanning measurements were done to spatially investigate the surface sensitivity. Plausible variations were measured. However, no hints were found how to improve the surface event recognition. The instrumentation of the guard ring, which surrounds the anode structure, was tested and improved the surface event discrimination significantly. The fraction of surviving alpha events was at a per-mill level. Important steps for a future large-scale COBRA experiment are discussed briefly, mainly the use of an integrated read-out system. Overall, the results indicate a large potential in background reduction for the COBRA experiment.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.