Paper detail

Comments on "Maximum or minimum entropy production ? How to select a necessary criterion of stability for a dissipative fluid or plasma"

In a recent paper, Phys. Rev E 81, 041137 (2010), the author attempts to derive ten necessary conditions for stability of dissipative fluids and plasmas. Assuming the validity of the local equilibrium principle, these criteria have been obtained solely from the first and the second laws of thermodynamics. The Onsager reciprocity relations have not been invoked and author's results are supposed to be valid independently of the choice of the boundary conditions. In the present paper, in agreement with the general theory established by Glansdorff-Prigogine in 1954 and 1970, we shall show that there is no variational principle expressing the necessary conditions for stability of dissipative systems involving convective effects when the system is out of the Onsager region. In particular, we shall prove that the basic equations constituting the starting point of the analysis of the author, attempting to derive ten necessary conditions for the stability involving magneto-hydrodynamical effects, are incorrect and in contradiction with the laws of the thermodynamics of irreversible processes.

preprint2012arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.