Paper detail

Comment to "Critical Exponents of the Superfluid-Bose Glass Transition in Three-Dimensions" by Z. Yao et al., arXiv:1402.5417v1

In this comment we address the preprint Z. Yao et al. (arXiv:1402.5417v1) concerning the conditions upon which the correct critical temperature exponent $ϕ$ can be observed (experimentally or numerically) close to the superfluid-Bose glass quantum phase transition in three dimensions. Yao et al. announce to have resolved the contradiction between the predictions of Fisher et al. [Phys. Rev. B 40, 546 (1989)] that $ϕ= νz \geq 2$ (where $ν$ and $z$ are critical exponents at the quantum phase transition) and recent experiments and simulations, showing an exponent $ϕ\sim 1.1$. Yao et al's resolution hinges on claiming that the $ϕ\sim 1.1$ observations, which were conducted by varying the chemical potential, were not made to sufficiently close to the critical point to observe universal behavior. Here we critically examine their criteria for observing universal behavior. We show that past simulations were in fact conducted closer to the quantum critical point than the new results of Yao et al.; and that Yao et al.'s own results for varying chemical potential are consistent with previous results showing $ϕ\sim 1.1$, and do not show a clear crossover to a different $ϕ$ value.

preprint2014arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.