Paper detail

Comment on: ``Using Ni Substitution and $^{17}$O NMR to Probe the Susceptibility $χ'(q)$ in Cuprates''

In a recent letter (PRL 79, 2117 (1997)), Bobroff et al. presented novel $^{17}$O NMR measurements for YBa_2(Cu_{1-x}Ni_x)_3O_{6+y} which offer a new probe of the momentum dependence of the static spin susceptibility $χ'(q)$. They analyzed the $^{17}$O line width by assuming a Gaussian form for $χ'$, and came to the conclusion that the correlation length $ξ$ is independent of temperature $T$. Furthermore, they claim that a Lorentzian form of $χ'$ yields the same result. We will demonstrate that the Lorentzian and Gaussian form of $χ'$ actually yield qualitatively different results for the $^{17}$O line width and its dependence on $ξ$. We show that their data when combined with $T_{2G}$ data from Takigawa require that $ξ$ be T-dependent. Furthermore, assuming a Gaussian form of $χ'$ leads to the unphysical result that $ξ$ increases with $T$. In contrast, the Lorentzian form of $χ'$ yields that $ξ$ decreases with increasing $T$ and is thus fully compatible with the experimental results.

preprint1997arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.