Paper detail

Comment on the cosmological constant and a gravitational alpha

We call attention to a simple analogy between atomic physics and cosmology. Both have two characteristic length scales. In atomic physics the lengths are the Compton wavelength of the electron and the Bohr radius; the ratio of these two lengths is the fine structure constant, $α=7.30\times10^{-3}$. In cosmology we take the lengths to be the Planck length and the de Sitter radius divided by $\sqrt 3$; the ratio of these two lengths is about $α_g=1.91\times10^{-61}$, which we suggest should be called the gravitational fine structure constant. There is also a basic energy ratio in atomic physics, the ratio of the hydrogen atom binding energy to the electron rest energy, which is equal to ${α^2}/2$. The analogous energy ratio in cosmology is the ratio of the dark energy density (described in terms of the cosmological constant) to the Planck energy density, which is equal to $(1/8π)α_g^2$. The long-standing problem of the nature of the dark energy and its small density is obviously equivalent to understanding the extraordinarily small value of $α_g$. We further emphasize that our observational knowledge of dark energy, which is consistent with the cosmological constant interpretation, is entirely on the cosmological scale, so we know essentially nothing about the nature of dark energy on a smaller and presumably more fundamental scale.

preprint2011arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.