BZPEERPapers, people, evidence and research paths
Menu

Discover

SearchFind papers, people, topics, institutions and opportunities from one place.GraphSee how papers, authors, topics and evidence connect.

Research tools

HomeContinue from the papers, people and topics that matter now.CollectionsTurn saved papers into reading lists, evidence maps and shareable context.ResearchReconstruct the path that led you from search to paper to question.CollaborationMove from a paper, topic or expert request into a focused thread.PublishCreate full-text research articles with metadata, formulas and versions.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists whose work and reviews explain why they can help.CommunitiesJoin research groups organized around papers, topics and shared evidence.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations connected to real research context.

Account

Log inReturn to your saved papers, graph views and active threads.Create accountStart saving papers, building a research trail and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Source author record

Ronald J. Adler

Ronald J. Adler appears in the imported research catalog. Authorship, coauthor and topic links are available while profile ownership is still unclaimed.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record
gr-qcquant-phastro-ph.COastro-ph.IMhep-thmath-phmath.MP

Catalog footprint

What is connected

11works
7topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Connect this record

Log in to claim
Open graphBrowse works

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

11 published item(s)

preprint2014arXiv

A quantum theory of distance along a curve

We present a quantum theory of distances along a curve, based on a linear line element that is equal to the operator square root of the quadratic metric of Riemannian geometry. Since the linear line element is an operator, we treat it according to the rules of quantum mechanics and interpret its eigenvalues as physically observable distances; the distance eigenvalues are naturally quantized. There are both positive and negative eigenvalues, which requires interpretation. Multi-element curves are defined as direct sums of line elements, and behave much like systems of spin half electrons in a magnetic field. For a curve of many elements an entropy and energy and temperature are quite naturally defined, leading via standard statistical thermodynamics to a relation between the most probable curve length and temperature. That relation may be viewed as a universal heat-shrinking property of curves. At this stage of the theory we do not include bodies or particles in the mix, do not suggest field equations for the quantum geometry, and questions of interpretation remain. The theory might conceivably be testable using observations of the early Universe, when the temperature of space was presumably quite high. In particular cosmogenesis may be thought of as time stopping at an infinite temperature as we go backwards in time to the beginning.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2014arXiv

On a digital quantum description of physical space versus the continuum description

The continuum of real numbers has served well as a model for physical space in mechanics and field theories. However it is a well-motivated and popular idea that at the fundamental Planck scale the combination of gravitational and quantum effects forces us to re-evaluate the concept of space (and time), and some sort of discreteness or granularity is expected. Here we study a cubic grid of points representing fundamental volumes of space and derive the spectra of momenta and wave number, which are not generally proportional to each other. The momentum is bounded and discrete for a finite grid. The uncertainty principle must be modified to reflect small scale spatial non-locality but it is consistent with the standard uncertainty principle in the continuum limit. We only consider kinematics in this work, and do not discuss time or energy or dynamical evolution.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2014arXiv

The three-fold theoretical basis of the Gravity Probe B gyro precession calculation

The Gravity Probe B (GP-B) experiment is complete and the results are in agreement with the predictions of general relativity (GR) for both the geodetic precession, 6.6 arcsec/yr to about 0.3%, and the Lense-Thirring precession, 39 marcsec to about 19%. This note is concerned with the theoretical basis for the predictions. The predictions depend on three elements of gravity theory, firstly that macroscopic gravity is described by a metric theory such as general relativity, secondly that the Lense-Thirring metric provides an approximate description of the gravitational field of the spinning earth, and thirdly that the spin axis of a gyroscope is parallel displaced in spacetime, which gives its equation of motion. We look at each of these three elements to show how each is solidly based on previous experiments and well-tested theory. The agreement of GP-B with theory strengthens our belief that all three elements are correct and increases our confidence in applying GR to astrophysical phenomena. Conversely, if GP-B had not verified the predictions a major theoretical quandary would have occurred.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2011arXiv

A terrestrial search for dark contents of the vacuum, such as dark energy, using atom interferometry

We describe the theory and first experimental work on our concept for searching on earth for the presence of dark content of the vacuum (DCV) using atom interferometry. Specifically, we have in mind any DCV that has not yet been detected on a laboratory scale, but might manifest itself as dark energy on the cosmological scale. The experimental method uses two atom interferometers to cancel the effect of earth's gravity and diverse noise sources. It depends upon two assumptions: first, that the DCV possesses some space inhomogeneity in density, and second that it exerts a sufficiently strong non-gravitational force on matter. The motion of the apparatus through the DCV should then lead to an irregular variation in the detected matter-wave phase shift. We discuss the nature of this signal and note the problem of distinguishing it from instrumental noise. We also discuss the relation of our experiment to what might be learned by studying the noise in gravitational wave detectors such as LIGO.The paper concludes with a projection that a future search of this nature might be carried out using an atom interferometer in an orbiting satellite. The apparatus is now being constructed.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2011arXiv

Comment on the cosmological constant and a gravitational alpha

We call attention to a simple analogy between atomic physics and cosmology. Both have two characteristic length scales. In atomic physics the lengths are the Compton wavelength of the electron and the Bohr radius; the ratio of these two lengths is the fine structure constant, $α=7.30\times10^{-3}$. In cosmology we take the lengths to be the Planck length and the de Sitter radius divided by $\sqrt 3$; the ratio of these two lengths is about $α_g=1.91\times10^{-61}$, which we suggest should be called the gravitational fine structure constant. There is also a basic energy ratio in atomic physics, the ratio of the hydrogen atom binding energy to the electron rest energy, which is equal to ${α^2}/2$. The analogous energy ratio in cosmology is the ratio of the dark energy density (described in terms of the cosmological constant) to the Planck energy density, which is equal to $(1/8π)α_g^2$. The long-standing problem of the nature of the dark energy and its small density is obviously equivalent to understanding the extraordinarily small value of $α_g$. We further emphasize that our observational knowledge of dark energy, which is consistent with the cosmological constant interpretation, is entirely on the cosmological scale, so we know essentially nothing about the nature of dark energy on a smaller and presumably more fundamental scale.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2011arXiv

Genesis and the tipping pencil; why the Universe is flat

In a room with five cosmologists there there may easily be ten theories of cosmogenesis. Cosmogenesis is a popular topic for speculation because it is philosophically deep and because such speculations are unlikely to be proven wrong in the near future. The scenario we present here was intended mainly as a pedagogical illustration or toy model, but it turns out to possibly have a more serious and interesting result - a rationale for the spatial flatness of the Universe. Our basic assumptions are that the cosmological scale factor obeys the standard Friedman equation of general relativistic cosmology and that the equation is dominated by a cosmological constant term and a curvature term; the dynamics of the Universe is then (approximately) the same as that of a tipping pencil. The scale factor cannot remain at an unstable initial value of zero and must increase (i.e. the Universe must come into existence) according to the uncertainty principle, that is due to quantum fluctuations; in other words we propose in a precise but limited context an answer to Heidegger's famous question "Why is there something rather than nothing." The mechanism is the same as that whereby an idealized pencil balanced on its point cannot remain so and must tip over. If it is moreover assumed that the Universe expands at the minimum asymptotic rate consistent with the uncertainty principle then the result is spatial flatness.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2011arXiv

Gravitomagnetism and spinor quantum mechanics

We give a systematic treatment of a spin 1/2 particle in a combined electromagnetic field and a weak gravitational field that is produced by a slowly moving matter source. This paper continues previous work on a spin zero particle, but it is largely self-contained and may serve as an introduction to spinors in a Riemann space. The analysis is based on the Dirac equation expressed in generally covariant form and coupled minimally to the electromagnetic field. The restriction to a slowly moving matter source, such as the earth, allows us to describe the gravitational field by a gravitoelectric (Newtonian) potential and a gravitomagnetic (frame-dragging) vector potential, the existence of which has recently been experimentally verified. Our main interest is the coupling of the orbital and spin angular momenta of the particle to the gravitomagnetic field. Specifically we calculate the gravitational gyromagnetic ratio as gsubg=1 ; this is to be compared with the electromagnetic gyromagnetic ratio of gsube=2 for a Dirac electron.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2010arXiv

Gravitomagnetism in Quantum Mechanics

We give a systematic treatment of the quantum mechanics of a spin zero particle in a combined electromagnetic field and a weak gravitational field, which is produced by a slow moving matter source. The analysis is based on the Klein-Gordon equation expressed in generally covariant form and coupled minimally to the electromagnetic field. The Klein-Gordon equation is recast into Schroedinger equation form (SEF), which we then analyze in the non-relativistic limit. We include a discussion of some rather general observable physical effects implied by the SEF, concentrating on gravitomagnetism. Of particular interest is the interaction of the orbital angular momentum of the particle with the gravitomagnetic field.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2010arXiv

Six easy roads to the Planck scale

We give six arguments that the Planck scale should be viewed as a fundamental minimum or boundary for the classical concept of spacetime, beyond which quantum effects cannot be neglected and the basic nature of spacetime must be reconsidered. The arguments are elementary, heuristic, and plausible, and as much as possible rely on only general principles of quantum theory and gravity theory. The paper is primarily pedagogical, and its main goal is to give physics students, non-specialists, engineers etc. an awareness and appreciation of the Planck scale and the role it should play in present and future theories of quantum spacetime and quantum gravity.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2001arXiv

The Generalized Uncertainty Principle and Black Hole Remnants

In the current standard viewpoint small black holes are believed to emit radiation as black bodies at the Hawking temperature, at least until they reach Planck size, after which their fate is open to conjecture. A cogent argument against the existence of remnants is that, since no evident quantum number prevents it, black holes should radiate completely away to photons and other ordinary stable particles and vacuum, like any unstable quantum system. Here we argue the contrary, that the generalized uncertainty principle may prevent their total evaporation in exactly the same way that the uncertainty principle prevents the hydrogen atom from total collapse: the collapse is prevented, not by symmetry, but by dynamics, as a minimum size and mass are approached.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint1999arXiv

On Gravity and the Uncertainty Principle

Heisenberg showed in the early days of quantum theory that the uncertainty principle follows as a direct consequence of the quantization of electromagnetic radiation in the form of photons. As we show here the gravitational interaction of the photon and the particle being observed modifies the uncertainty principle with an additional term. From the modified or gravitational uncertainty principle it follows that there is an absolute minimum uncertainty in the position of any particle, of order of the Planck length. A modified uncertainty relation of this form is a standard result of superstring theory, but the derivation given here is based on simpler and rather general considerations with either Newtonian gravitational theory or general relativity theory.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access