Paper detail

Comment on 'Encoding many channels on the same frequency through radio vorticity: first experimental test'

We show that the public experiment held in Venice by F. Tamburini et al and reported in (2012 New J. Phys. 14 033001) can be regarded as a particular implementation of Multiple-Input Multiple-Output (MIMO) communications, hence bringing no advantages with respect to known techniques. Moreover, we explain that the use of a 'vortex' mode (orbital angular momentum OAM l = 1) at one of the transmit antennas is not necessary to encode different channels since only different patterns -or similarly different pointing angles- of the transmit antennas are required. Finally, we identify why this MIMO transmission allowed decoding of two signals despite being line-of-sight. This is due to the large separation between the receiving antennas, which places the transmit antennas in the near-field Fresnel region of the receiving 'array'. This strongly limits the application of this technique in practice, since, for a fixed separation between receiving antennas, the detectable signal power from any additional vortex mode decays at least as 1/r^4.

preprint2012arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.