Paper detail

Comment on "Self-doping effects in cobalt silicide CoSi: Electrical, magnetic, elastic, and thermodynamic properties"

In this Comment it is argued that Stishov et al. [Phys. Rev. B 86, 064433 (2012)] incorrectly estimated concentrations of (supposed) paramagnetic centers with μ_eff = 4.8μ_B in the investigated CoSi crystals. Correct estimation gives concentrations of such centers from 25 to 50 times smaller than reported (appr. 0.04 to 0.16% instead of appr. 2 to 4%). Also the reported data on temperature dependence of resistivity ρ(T) of four CoSi crystals prepared in different Labs are so close to each other at T = 250 to 300K that it is extremely unlikely to be reproducible for any reasonable accuracy of resistivity measurements. These and some other problems of the paper are related to the key points of the authors argumentation. As a result their main conclusions become unjustified.

preprint2013arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.