Paper detail

Comment on "Motional Averaging of Nuclear Resonance in a Field Gradient"

In the Letter by Nanette N. Jarenwattananon and Louis-S. Bouchard [PRL 114, 197601 (2015)] an NMR experiment on gases in the presence of a magnetic-field gradient has been considered. As distinct from the traditional description of molecular self-diffusion, the authors calculate the decoherence of the signal taking into account the histories of molecular displacements. For this purpose the generalized Langevin equation (GLE) is applied. We show that the use of this equation is inappropriate. The calculations performed in the Letter are not correct and do not lead to the reported revised expression for line broadening that takes into account the autocorrelation effects in the diffusion process. The surprising temperature behavior of the observed NMR signal is thus not explained. In particular, the linewidth does not follow the power law f ~ T^(-1/2) at high temperatures. We give also Remarks on the Jarenwattananon and Bouchard Reply [Phys. Rev. Lett. 117, 249702 (2016)].

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.