Paper detail

Comment on "High energy neutron scattering from hydrogen using a direct geometry spectrometer". C. Stock, R A Cowley, J W Taylor and S M Bennington [arXiv:0907.1945]

The paper in the title [1] reports measurements of neutron scattering from hydrogen in the 1-100 eV range of energy transfers, using the direct geometry MARI spectrometer at ISIS. Stock et al claim that their measurements have better or comparable energy resolution to those on the inverse geometry VESUVIO spectrometer at ISIS. Most importantly the main conclusions of ref [1] are not valid unless this claim is true: in particular the conclusion that anomalous neutron cross sections measured on VESUVIO [2] are "the result of experimental issues using indirect geometry spectrometers". We present here overwhelming evidence that the energy resolution of the measurements in ref [1] is much coarser than on VESUVIO. It follows that the conclusions of Stock et al are unfounded. In reality the measurements of reference [1] serve mainly to demonstrate that at eV neutron energies, direct geometry chopper spectrometers have greatly inferior energy resolution to inverse geometry spectrometers based on resonance foil methods.

preprint2010arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.