Paper detail

Comment on "Experimental Determination of the Statistics of Photons Emitted by a Tunnel Junction"

A very recent article [(1) E. Zakka-Bajjani et al., PRL104, 206802 (2010)] has addressed the problem of how the statistics of electrons crossing a quantum conductor influences that of the photons they emit. It is however not clear that the detection used in [1] is sensitive to emitted photons and not to the overall electromagnetic fluctuations, which include vacuum fluctuations. We show that the proof in [1] that non-symmetrized noise is detected is erroneous: supposing that the detection simply takes the square of the voltage, i.e. is sensitive to vacuum fluctuations, leads to identical results. We demonstrate that all the results can be explained in terms of usual gaussian voltage fluctuations instead of photon statistics. Finally, it is found in [1] that the photon noise is gaussian for a tunnel junction, for which the electron counting statistics is poissonian. We show that this result is beyond the experimental sensitivity by at least one order of magnitude, and thus is also incorrect.

preprint2010arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.