Paper detail

COMET Phase-I Technical Design Report

The Technical Design for the COMET Phase-I experiment is presented in this paper. COMET is an experiment at J-PARC, Japan, which will search for neutrinoless conversion of muons into electrons in the field of an aluminium nucleus ($μ-e$ conversion, $μ^- N \to e^- N$); a lepton flavor violating process. The experimental sensitivity goal for this process in the Phase-I experiment is $3.1\times10^{-15}$, or 90 % upper limit of branching ratio of $7\times 10^{-15}$, which is a factor of 100 improvement over the existing limit. The expected number of background events is 0.032. To achieve the target sensitivity and background level, the 3.2 kW 8 GeV proton beam from J-PARC will be used. Two types of detectors, CyDet and StrECAL, will be used for detecting the \mue conversion events, and for measuring the beam-related background events in view of the Phase-II experiment, respectively. Results from simulation on signal and background estimations are also described.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
The COMET CollaborationR. AbramishviliG. AdamovR. R. AkhmetshinA. AllinJ. C. AngéliqueV. AnishchikM. AokiD. AznabayevI. BagaturiaG. BanY. BanD. BauerD. BaygarashevA. E. BondarC. CârloganuB. CarniolT. T. ChauJ. K. ChenS. J. ChenY. E. CheungW. Da SilvaP. D. DaunceyC. DenshamG. DevidzeP. DornanA. DrutskoyV. DuginovY. EguchiL. B. EpshteynP. EvtoukhovichS. FayerG. V. FedotovichM. Finger JrM. FingerY. FujiiY. FukaoJ. L. GabrielP. GayE. GilliesD. N. GrigorievK. GritsayV. H. HaiE. HamadaI. H. HashimS. HashimotoO. HayashiT. HayashiT. HiasaZ. A. IbrahimY. IgarashiF. V. IgnatovM. IioK. IshibashiA. IssadykovT. ItahashiA. JansenX. S. JiangP. JonssonT. KachelhofferV. KalinnikovE. KanevaF. KapustaH. KatayamaK. KawagoeR. KawashimaN. KazakV. F. KazaninO. KemulariaA. KhvedelidzeM. KoikeT. KormollG. A. KozlovA. N. KozyrevM. KravchenkoB. KriklerG. KumsiashviliY. KunoY. KuriyamaY. KurochkinA. KurupB. LagrangeJ. LaiM. J. LeeH. B. LiR. P. LitchfieldW. G. LiT. LoanD. LomidzeI. LomidzeP. LoveridgeG. MacharashviliY. MakidaY. J. MaoO. MarkinY. MatsudaA. MelkadzeA. MelnikT. MibeS. MiharaN. MiyamotoY. MiyazakiF. Mohamad IdrisK. A. Mohamed Kamal AzmiA. MoiseenkoM. MoritsuY. MoriT. MotoishiH. NakaiY. NakaiT. NakamotoY. NakamuraY. NakatsugawaY. NakazawaJ. NashH. NatoriV. NiessM. NioradzeH. NishiguchiK. NoguchiT. NumaoJ. O'DellT. OgitsuS. OhtaK. OishiK. OkamotoT. OkamuraK. OkinakaC. OmoriT. OtaJ. PasternakA. PaulauD. PictersV. PonariadovG. QuémenerA. A. RubanV. RusinovB. SabirovH. SakamotoP. SarinK. SasakiA. SatoJ. SatoY. K. SemertzidisN. ShigyoDz. ShoukavyM. SluneckaD. StöckingerM. SuganoT. TachimotoT. TakayanagiM. TanakaJ. TangC. V. TaoA. M. TeixeiraY. TevzadzeT. ThanhJ. TojoS. S. TolmachevM. TomasekM. TomizawaT. ToriashviliH. TrangI. TrekovZ. TsamalaidzeN. TsveravaT. UchidaY. UchidaK. UenoE. VelichevaA. VolkovV. VrbaW. A. T. Wan AbdullahP. Warin-CharpentierM. L. WongT. S. WongC. WuT. Y. XingH. YamaguchiA. YamamotoM. YamanakaT. YamaneY. YangT. YanoW. C. YaoB. YeoH. YoshidaM. YoshidaT. YoshiokaY. YuanYu. V. YudinM. V. ZdorovetsJ. ZhangY. ZhangK. Zuber
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Authors

The COMET CollaborationR. AbramishviliG. AdamovR. R. AkhmetshinA. AllinJ. C. AngéliqueV. AnishchikM. AokiD. AznabayevI. BagaturiaG. BanY. BanD. BauerD. BaygarashevA. E. BondarC. CârloganuB. CarniolT. T. ChauJ. K. ChenS. J. ChenY. E. CheungW. Da SilvaP. D. DaunceyC. DenshamG. DevidzeP. DornanA. DrutskoyV. DuginovY. EguchiL. B. EpshteynP. EvtoukhovichS. FayerG. V. FedotovichM. Finger JrM. FingerY. FujiiY. FukaoJ. L. GabrielP. GayE. GilliesD. N. GrigorievK. GritsayV. H. HaiE. HamadaI. H. HashimS. HashimotoO. HayashiT. HayashiT. HiasaZ. A. IbrahimY. IgarashiF. V. IgnatovM. IioK. IshibashiA. IssadykovT. ItahashiA. JansenX. S. JiangP. JonssonT. KachelhofferV. KalinnikovE. KanevaF. KapustaH. KatayamaK. KawagoeR. KawashimaN. KazakV. F. KazaninO. KemulariaA. KhvedelidzeM. KoikeT. KormollG. A. KozlovA. N. KozyrevM. KravchenkoB. KriklerG. KumsiashviliY. KunoY. KuriyamaY. KurochkinA. KurupB. LagrangeJ. LaiM. J. LeeH. B. LiR. P. LitchfieldW. G. LiT. LoanD. LomidzeI. LomidzeP. LoveridgeG. MacharashviliY. MakidaY. J. MaoO. MarkinY. MatsudaA. MelkadzeA. MelnikT. MibeS. MiharaN. MiyamotoY. MiyazakiF. Mohamad IdrisK. A. Mohamed Kamal AzmiA. MoiseenkoM. MoritsuY. MoriT. MotoishiH. NakaiY. NakaiT. NakamotoY. NakamuraY. NakatsugawaY. NakazawaJ. NashH. NatoriV. NiessM. NioradzeH. NishiguchiK. NoguchiT. NumaoJ. O'DellT. OgitsuS. OhtaK. OishiK. OkamotoT. OkamuraK. OkinakaC. OmoriT. OtaJ. PasternakA. PaulauD. PictersV. PonariadovG. QuémenerA. A. RubanV. RusinovB. SabirovH. SakamotoP. SarinK. SasakiA. SatoJ. SatoY. K. SemertzidisN. ShigyoDz. ShoukavyM. SluneckaD. StöckingerM. SuganoT. TachimotoT. TakayanagiM. TanakaJ. TangC. V. TaoA. M. TeixeiraY. TevzadzeT. ThanhJ. TojoS. S. TolmachevM. TomasekM. TomizawaT. ToriashviliH. TrangI. TrekovZ. TsamalaidzeN. TsveravaT. UchidaY. UchidaK. UenoE. VelichevaA. VolkovV. VrbaW. A. T. Wan AbdullahP. Warin-CharpentierM. L. WongT. S. WongC. WuT. Y. XingH. YamaguchiA. YamamotoM. YamanakaT. YamaneY. YangT. YanoW. C. YaoB. YeoH. YoshidaM. YoshidaT. YoshiokaY. YuanYu. V. YudinM. V. ZdorovetsJ. ZhangY. ZhangK. Zuber

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.