Paper detail

Combining Density and Overlap (CoDO): A New Method for Assessing the Significance of Overlap Among Subgraphs

Algorithms for detecting clusters (including overlapping clusters) in graphs have received significant attention in the research community. A closely related important aspect of the problem -- quantification of statistical significance of overlap of clusters, remains relatively unexplored. This paper presents the first theoretical and practical results on quantifying statistically significant interactions between clusters in networks. Such problems commonly arise in diverse applications, ranging from social network analysis to systems biology. The paper addresses the problem of quantifying the statistical significance of the observed overlap of the two clusters in an Erdős-Rényi graph model. The analytical framework presented in the paper assigns a $p$-value to overlapping subgraphs by combining information about both the sizes of the subgraphs and their edge densities in comparison to the corresponding values for their overlapping component. This $p$-value is demonstrated to have excellent discrimination properties in real applications and is shown to be robust across broad parameter ranges. Our results are comprehensively validated on synthetic, social, and biological networks. We show that our framework: (i) derives insight from both the density and the size of overlap among communities (circles/pathways), (ii) consistently outperforms state-of-the-art methods over all tested datasets, and (iii) when compared to other measures, has much broader application scope. In the context of social networks, we identify highly interdependent (social) circles and show that our predictions are highly co-enriched with known user features. In networks of biomolecular interactions, we show that our method identifies novel cross-talk between pathways, sheds light on their mechanisms of interaction, and provides new opportunities for investigations of biomolecular interactions.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.